Herrera’s letter to We CARE founder John Wisda noted that, although the petition includes proposed language that would be inserted into the General Plan, it fails to contain “text showing where in the General Plan the language would be inserted,” what parts of the Land Use Element would be changed, or what the current text of same reads. “Neither the General Plan nor the Land Use Element of the General Plan are attached or incorporated into the proposed initiative,” and it does not provide the full information required by the Elections Code to be supplied to signature voters, Herrera wrote.Wisda said Friday that he does not know what We CARE’s next action would be, but that the rejection of the petition - which qualified with more than 2,200 signatures of registered voters - is “a reflection on the city council.” Through the signatures gathered in support of the initiative, the people have already voted and the “council can enact an ordinance” adopting the measure and reflecting the will of the people. “It’s up to the council now,” Wisda added.The rejection of the We CARE initiative petition is the second time in more than a decade that a petition was refused due to a technical error. In the 1990s the petition by proponents of converting a mobile home park for tenant land ownership garnered enough signatures for ballot placement, but was refused when the text of the measure did not appear on each signature page. The mobile home park measure’s supporters again gathered enough valid signatures and ultimately qualified the measure on the ballot, but the ownership proposal never materialized.