Bobby from Sam's Market on Harvard for the chicken.Nancy Gonzales and Christine Gomez donated the tickets.Izzy and Eve Mora for their generous donation.Thank you to the people and organizations who made donations anonymously.Thank you to all of the parents and extended families for donating their time and efforts. Thank you to the community for setting an example of generosity and participation.Judith DonatoSecretary for the teamSanta PaulaContract extensionTo the Editor:Re: City Council Extension of City Manager's ContractThe recent brief article regarding the Council majority's vote to extend City Manager, Peter Cosentini's, contract accurately described the discussion - brief but costly.One should contrast the two-year Police Officer negotiations with the unexpected early contract renewal of the City Manager. The S.P.P.O.A. labor negotiations culminated in an overflow meeting of public safety supporters which saw the Council majority unilaterally implement a 2% ($34,000) contract.In a matter of possibly five minutes the City Manager had quite easily convinced the Council on a 4-1 vote that his "at will" status was really worth a six year binding contract and over $300,000 in salary alone. Benefits such as life insurance policy, automobile, health benefits, pension, etc. are above this amount. One might question what specific accomplishments garnered an "at will" employee such a steep reward for only 1 1/2 years tenure in the city. Mayor Garfield stated it was important for Cosentini "to have something to hang his hat on."A review of the City Manager's contract will show that the City Manager already had many protections. The current three-year contract allowed for lump sum cash payment of six months severance salary and benefits package if the Council chose to release him from the contract. The contract called for a review seven months prior to the termination of the contract so that Mr. Cosentini and his family could have assurances of his continued employment.Additionally, if the council should fail to timely declare, at least six months prior to the termination of the contract, its intent to negotiate a new contract or extend the current one the contract shall be automatically be extended for a period equal to that during which such intention is not declared. The City Manager also has protection during the 90 day period following a general or special election for City Council. Mr. Cosentini and his family are well protected to the tune of over $300,000, an amount not yet budgeted for but now encumbered.An added note, Mr. Cosentini strongly advised the Council not to provide a contract for Police Chief Bob Gonzales because this position was "at will."Laura Flores EspinosaCouncil WomanSanta PaulaJustice Department threatens Louisiana parentsTo the Editor:In a previous letter to the Santa Paula Times, I discussed the wrong-headed opinion of the Acting Attorney General of the United States, Bill Lee. Mr. Lee believes that Santa Paula's at-large voting practice is discriminatory against Hispanics and, at the urging of Councilwoman Laura Flores Espinosa, Lee's views may result in the Justice Department filing suit against our town.Currently, of three councils elected in city-wide voting, only one is majority Anglo, the city council. The other two, the elementary and high school boards, are majority Hispanic. Surely this is an indication that local voters can and do exercise the right to vote for whomever they wish. As I stated, if at-large voting is scrapped, you and I will be allowed to vote for only one city council person, not all five as we can now. Under district voting, only one city council person will represent you and be answerable to your concerns. You will not be able to vote for family or friends running for office if they live across town or even down the street, if that is where one of the five district lines happens to be drawn.Since my letter appeared, a number of Hispanic letter-writers have commented that they want to continue voting for five council persons, not just one that that the current at-large system does not inhibit them for voting for whom they please.This week, I ran across an article in a nationwide newspaper, Investors Business Daily, which reported that the Acting Attorney General is attempting to obstruct not just Santa Paula voters, but parents of school children in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Parents in Baton Rouge organized a charter school and were set to enroll 650 local, mostly low-income minority children. The parents want an alternative to public education but cannot afford private schools. But Mr. Lee believes that the new school will attract minority students who have been traveling to predominantly white schools, and leave the white schools less integrated than they had been. For this reason, the Justice Department will try to bar the kids from attending the school of their choice by filing suit against the new school. Because someone complained, Mr. Lee is going to fix a problem that does not exist by ensuring that everyone has fewer choices rather than more.Likewise, here in Santa Paula, because someone complained, Mr. Lee is going to fix a problem that does not exist by ensuring that we have fewer choices for city council - one choice instead of five. Santa Paula is too small to be divided into separate districts. This time, race is being used to promote a bad idea.Stop this misguided man and his bad ideas. Call City Hall now at 525-4478 and tell them you want to vote for five not just one.Rita GrahamSanta Paula